![]() Hearing that the ranger is rather weak, unless he is pure ranger, and playing him during 1's campaign already, makes me want to switch it up. I was suggested to rush it to level 10 right away as I made my Ranger/Summoner. To many people have said late game it falls off. Yeah, I'm not really interested in a Summoner anymore. The versatility of being able to use a bow/crossbow in a pinch and the extra reach in melee combat is really appealing to me. Originally posted by Hobocop:I personally find 2H Finesse Warfare using a spear to be pretty fun even if it is easier and more straightforward to just play a Strength character with a similar build. I'm not really interested in a tank for my guy. If my friend is a rogue, do you think it would be better to have, say myself as a lone wolf and him not choosing it so we have at least one more guy? Perhaps a tanky guy? I feel we both would be to squishy, but the increase from lone wolf makes me think it works out. I know that you can basically make any build work, but I want to have more of a set path than winging it this time. What builds have you guys done that you found the most fun (for a duel lone wolf run)? The necro/summer looked like it could be fun. ![]() And I'm not sure I want to even play 88 hours as a ranger again (even though I loved it). After doing some brief research it doesn't seem like a Ranger/Summoner is that good. I was planning on doing summoning and took the bread and butter summon spell. I made a Ranger as the already named guy (I forget his name Izz something, he summons wolf). He picked a shadowblade undead, I think because of invisible and sounding good for a rogue obviously. He wants to make a rogue again, we only got to making our characters so far. This time I want to do lone wolf together. My archer was pretty clutch in a lot of situations. But by the end of the game he was super strong. He died a lot as a rogue, often being the only one dead after battle. The previous game I was an archer (added charm down later) and he was a rogue. ![]() I did play until the first town, skipping the story and just seeing what the game feels like now. I've had this game for awhile, but have waited for a friend to get it because the 1st one we put 88 hours into it and I think it's hands down my favorite COOP game. Highly recommended, and GREAT to play with friends.Happy New Year everyone. Then there's Tactician, which is recommended for people that have played DOS, or have played turn-based game like this before, or just want a challenge - and lastly Honour mode, which isn't for the feint of heart.Īll in all. There are four difficulties, and Explorer (which is ridiculously easy) and Classic (which is 'normal', slightly reduced difficulty) are appropriate for first timers. It is absolutely awash with decision making that has an impact - at times simple and obvious, such as singular quest-related impacts, and at other times having an impact on the game world in a dramatic way, or the main characters. I disagree about your comment on DOS, but DOS2 has even more of it. builds that directly and obviously work well together. I would rather recommend something like Warfare / Poly, or Scoundrel / Necro, or Aero/Hydro, Hunstmans / Hydro (or Geo) etc. Classes are balanced, but some are more difficult to use than others, and will require more intimate knowledge of skills, stats and gear etc.įor example, I wouldn't recommend a hybrid build such as an Intelligence / Warfare build to a new player, or even a Necro / Summoner (which despite complimenting each other, can still be a troublesome playstyle for your first time). At first it seems really difficult, but once you learn how it works, and how to essentially "abuse" the system, it becomes easy. Still, it shines above most turn based combat I've encountered, and I imagine most people thoroughly enjoy it. The combat is fantastic, albeit flawed. I put it in speech marks, because the "humour" of DOS I didn't think much of - it reminded me too much of my Fable days, where the game world tried to be somewhat comedic and amusing through childishness and 'silly' personas - whereas DOS2 takes on a more vivid and at times morbid stand point.įor sure, there are comedic moments, and some of the characters are that same old sarcastic sass-pot, but for the most part it's more mature than DOS (not that DOS lacked maturity). The story is great, though the main plot isn't the most unique, it's still of high quality, and the characters are decent. though for a first playthrough I definitely recommend working together, so nobody is missing out on quests or anything, and also the game might be too hard for you otherwise. You can work together, or against each other in a race along the main quest. Multiplayer is decent, interactive, and really fun.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |